Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > OzECruisers (E/N/D Series) > OzECruisers General Discussions

OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-09-2008, 11:19 PM   #1
falconboy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default NL Fairlane Ghia V8 Buying advice please....

Hi all, hoping for some advice about a car I'm thinking of buying.

I've got an ED Fairmont Ghia V8 as a temporary runabout whilst in between cars (looking to buy a BA/BF Futura wagon), and since buying it realised how I missed some luxury and in my cars (not much choice in wagons that I've owned), and how I do like the V8 (I'm a V8 virgin)

Thinking I don't really need a wagon, although they are handy, and I've come across someone I know who has a 98 NL Fairlane Ghia V8 at what seems a good price of $4500, HOWEVER, I've been told its got over 300,000 k's on it.

My main question is about fuel economy. I'm hoping once I check this thing out a bit closer, if I buy it, I hope to keep it for a while, but the fuel economy is an issue. I realise a V8 will use a decent amount of petrol, but the ED I have is disgraceful, and the amount of fuel it uses I would only ever want it as a temporary runaround. Do I assume correctly that even though the NL is a lot newer, that mechanically its similar enough that fuel usage would be similar to the ED, given its probably a bit heavier than the ED as well.

Thanks

falconboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 12:15 AM   #2
froggie22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Default

keep looking for another one, there is a few for sale around that mark that don't have that sort of km's on it.
I got an nf and it averages about 15L/100km it loves to cruise and sits at about 7 or 8L/100km when doing about 100kms.. so its not that bad.
froggie22 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 01:36 AM   #3
wazza69
Regular Member
 
wazza69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 162
Default

I have a DF LTD, it has the 5.0 V8 in it, and has done 330000km - which is nothing for those motors, fuel economy is great - averages 10-11L/100km.
__________________
Current Rides:
2015 Ford Transit Custom
1967 ZA Fairlane 289W - Thread: https://fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11456233
2005 Suzuki GSX1400
wazza69 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 01:49 AM   #4
schnoods
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
schnoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 1,234
Default

300,00km is just run in on a windsor!

However the rest of it isnt, you should be able to find something similar in that price range with the 8 in it, a fairlane or fairmont, perhaps a LTD. Nice cruisers, just make sure it idles fine and the auto doesnt slip, you should be fine.


Until the bug bites. :
__________________
A philosopher is a person who finds a problem for every solution . :Reverend:

95 EF XR8, Advance headers, Vortech V2 t trim blower, Ported Cobra Manifold, Capa Switch Chip Eliminator. 307 rwhp 395 ft/lb 13.2 @ 105mph

Now NA- AFR 165 heads, 1.6RR, Ported Cobra 269rwhp 14.2 ... needs stall and 4.11's

1977 CL Chrysler Panel Van, 360, 727 torqueflite auto soon to be restored.
schnoods is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 01:52 AM   #5
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,701
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

I have an NF Fairlane Ghia, and it uses around 24l/100km on LPG - no idea what it uses on petrol, but it has to be better than that! Just changed the O2 sensors today, and already idle has improved markedly, so here's hoping LPG comsumption will get better (looking for under 20l/100km). They're a nice car though; you won't be disappointed!
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 08:15 AM   #6
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,325
Default

you know this is what you really want.

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...=1#post2337115

shameless free plug for my car :

Last edited by prydey; 26-09-2008 at 08:22 AM.
prydey is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 08:49 AM   #7
falconboy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default

Good try prydey.

Thanks for the comments. Usually I wouldn't even look twice at a car with so many k's, but I'm under the impression he's owned it since new (or close to), and he is definitely a enthusiast who looks after his cars and gets them serviced when required - and a lot can be said for regular servicing. There is another one local (an NF though) which I will check out as well and compare.
falconboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 11:33 AM   #8
Powdered Toast Man
Professional Mouse Jockey
 
Powdered Toast Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SE Vic
Posts: 3,185
Default

An NL Fairlane won't use less fuel than your ED Fairmont. About the only fuel saving upgrade between the ED 5.0L and the NL 5.0L is the fact that the ED has a clutch fan and the NL has thermos. And then like you said the Fairlane is heavier, an equivelant EL Fairmont Ghia would be heavier than your ED ghia so a Fairlane would difinitely be heavier.
__________________
Isuzu MUX for towing horses - currently no Fords in the stable

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. Groucho Marx
Powdered Toast Man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 05:19 PM   #9
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,391
Default

You never buy a V8 with fuel economy in mind. Relatively speaking though, there wouldn't be a great deal different between the Fairlane and your ED assuming that there is nothing wrong with it in the first place
__________________
1999 Range Rover 4.6 V8. Soon to have a new blue oval bent eight.
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2008, 05:29 PM   #10
klawsterfobik
Bad Music and Litre Bikes
 
klawsterfobik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westmeadows
Posts: 2,446
Default

It REALLY depends on how your driving it.

I've a DFII LTD, with the same amount of K's (316,000) and I use anywhere from 11 - 14 l/100.

Things to look out for include Electric Windows, Climate Control working properly and then the engine, trans etc.
__________________
XY Wagon - NAKED!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gammaboy
Anyway. Enough reality, back to the topic.
klawsterfobik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2008, 02:42 PM   #11
falconboy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default

Thanks guys. Not really 'worried' about fuel economy as such I guess, but was hoping the NL might be a bit better than the ED. Trip computer on the ED says 14.6L per 100K. THe NL is on the back burner at the moment considering the K's I think.

I saw a NF Fairlaine, classy looking car but just didn't feel right, seemed to be lacking power, a lot of the power options weren't working etc. Albeit it was only $3500.
__________________
______________________________________
2006 BF MKII Winter White Wagon
falconboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2008, 03:53 PM   #12
DBourne
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
DBourne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney.nsw.au
Posts: 6,119
Default

first off, dont let the K's worry you at all.

second, if you do a few things like a free flowing exhaust and intake, and a light foot i'd say the economy won't hurt you anymore than what you are used to now
__________________
flickr
DBourne is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2008, 04:39 PM   #13
falconboy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SgtBourne
and a light foot
Thats easier said than done.
__________________
______________________________________
2006 BF MKII Winter White Wagon
falconboy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2008, 09:01 PM   #14
NFLANE
Regular Member
 
NFLANE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bendigo,Victoria
Posts: 107
Default

i got a nf fairlane its got about 136,000ks (its only a baby) and it pretty fuel efficent a tanks last me about 350-400ks around town
NFLANE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL