|
|
24-09-2020, 01:31 PM | #1 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
1. you're comparing 2018 with 2020... what social distancing measures were implemented in 2018? likely, virtually none, rendering a direct comparison irrelevant. 2. serology studies suggest the flu hit a very significant proportion of the population (close to half). covid-19 has been a fraction. now compare the death rates. Let covid-19 run rampant, and you will have a problem that dwarfs a bad flu year. |
|||
5 users like this post: |
24-09-2020, 04:10 PM | #2 | |||
Budget Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,416
|
Quote:
How many people have not been hospitalised or died from flu this year that would have in a 'normal' year because of the measures to stop Covid-19 transmission? In Australia the number of flu deaths this winter was zero. 36 people have died of flu in Australia so far this year, last year it was about 500. We know Covid-19 is more contagious than flu. The hospital system would be over run if Covid-19 gets away from us, and not just by the Covid-19 infected. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...c56a8c0cfb7fb6 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-...ralia/12480190
__________________
12.1@112Mph 285rwkw on n2o Cleveland Power |
|||
24-09-2020, 06:20 PM | #3 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
Yes, there's been a huge economic cost. But there are a lot of people who would have otherwise been dead. Arguably, if covid-19 had been allowed to run rampant, people would have started self-isolating out of fear for themselves or for family, especially if things had started becoming like they were in Italy or Spain. I don't think it's really worthwhile blaming the government for overreacting. |
|||
This user likes this post: |