Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2010, 08:30 AM   #91
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

If a slightly smaller more fuel efficient Falcon was developed,
it could then serve as an alternative to Mondeo/Fusion in
key markets in our region as well as unique Lincoln products.

A next generation Taurus could then take over the mantle of
full sized car replacing Falcon/Fairlane and relieving FoA of
the financial pressure to develop such vehicles and freeing
FoA to reposition Falcon as global player in tandem with Mustang.

I could live with that idea.

Broadmeadows could then be RHD production centre
for Falcon/Ute, Mustang/Capri, Taurus/Explorer (or Territory)

Last edited by jpd80; 06-10-2010 at 08:35 AM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 11:20 AM   #92
Joe5619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Dazz
Whilst that all sounds very pithy, and an apparently great “put-down,” unfortunately it’s absolute rubbish.
We knew almost a decade ahead of time that the EA26 was going to be developed in Australia, and the same for the AU (code name escapes me for the moment.) Similarly the Barra and Orion were telegraphed well ahead of time.


These articles say absolutely NOTHING new, and give absolutely ZERO guarantees about the future of Falcon as an Australian Car, yet suddenly everyone is drunk on the euphoria of false hope.
This is simply a PR exercise around managing expectations. As I said, what this confirms 100% is that the next “all new” Falcon will be based on some 2nd rate Yank platform, but of course they’re going to try and package that in the sweetest language possible. It’s bit like the VL Commodore. GM didn’t come out and say that they’d given up on the Aussie 6, and bought a rubbish Datsun engine. No, they trumpeted their new OHC engine. Whatever shape the next all-new Falcon takes, you can rest assured that it will be sold to us as the latest and greatest, and many will choose to believe it. Just look at the VN; a hasty botch of an inflated Opel body, on a bastardised VK platform, with an archaic Buick engine. Relatively speaking the worst car Holden ever made, yet GMH diehards flocked to it like the 2nd Coming.

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE American cars, the bigger the better. They were serving up luxury appointments when we were still making do with 3 on the tree and vinyl. On balance, they are probably still the best car makers in the world, and their best engines are awesome. (I just wish that we’d start getting their engines when they were still new, instead of when they’re looking to get of old junk!)
But let’s face it, the American concept of “handling” is that it should be comfortable sitting in a traffic jam. Don’t believe me, just read any review of Any American car; they all read the same: “Good Looks, Great Value for Money, Comfortable & Well-Appointed, Load of Power, and CRAP Steering and Cornering. The Mustang has gotten away with it’s archaic platform, simply because it COULD. Why fix it if nobody complains.

Whilst I will lament the passing of the I6, switching to a global all-alloy quad-cam V6 could yield significant benefits, provided we get the latest versions and not the cast offs.

As I indicated, I just hope that Ford Australia get significant input into the development of this platform, Retuning the platform to what we expect in the way of handling, should be relatively simple with enough Australian input. I’d be quite happy with an AWD Falcon, provided it retains a big torquey engine. However FWD would be the pits.
Igot to love how you start with (And I quote) "These articles say absolutely NOTHING new, and give absolutely ZERO guarantees about the future of Falcon as an Australian Car", yet go on to say (and I quote) "what this confirms 100% is that the next “all new” Falcon will be based on some 2nd rate Yank platform"..

Those 2 comments alone contradict each other, so you can't have it both ways I'm afraid!!
Joe5619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 12:20 PM   #93
billy302
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
If a slightly smaller more fuel efficient Falcon was developed,
it could then serve as an alternative to Mondeo/Fusion in
key markets in our region as well as unique Lincoln products.

A next generation Taurus could then take over the mantle of
full sized car replacing Falcon/Fairlane and relieving FoA of
the financial pressure to develop such vehicles and freeing
FoA to reposition Falcon as global player in tandem with Mustang.

I could live with that idea.

Broadmeadows could then be RHD production centre
for Falcon/Ute, Mustang/Capri, Taurus/Explorer (or Territory)
The Next generation Taurus is I believe a larger car than Falcon is now.
As for economy 8/litres/100Km in the country is great for a 4.0 litre engine.
it's not bad in the City either.
Rear Wheel Drive makes sense in Australia.
billy302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 01:00 PM   #94
XRFutura
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XRFutura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hazelbrook, NSW
Posts: 895
Default

just saw this article on carpoint, sorry if this is repost. Looks very promising.
Ford Boss: Falcon safe beyond 2015
__________________
2014 Ford FG MKII G6E Turbo
1999 Ford AU Falcon Forte


Past Vehicles:
2015 Ford Territory TS MKII - diesel burner
2016 Ford FM Mustang GT - The Dream Car
2007 FPV BF MKII GT - popping the V8 cherry
1997 Ford EL Falcon Futura - 6 cylinders of fury
XRFutura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 01:01 PM   #95
Gobes32
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Gobes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
Default

I am a glass half full kind of guy so here is my take on things......

E8 platform being sent o'seas suggests that the control blade IRS is going in the Mustang, hell, if FPV can get 4.6 secs with that **** end then why not plant it in the Mustang?

An American being sent over to lend a hand suggests he is developing a LHD model of Falcon's next chassis.........?

Australia's design team is regarded as world class due to exciting platforms designed on limited budgets. Also, no where else in the world can factories produce such limited numbers of vehicles profitably like we can. ( except for Ferrari, Porsche etc. )

It makes sense for Oz to design and build a large RWD vehicle and produce the RHD variants here, and share that design with an american factory producing the LHD variants.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
A G8E would be good if Ford marketed squarely at Calais V8 owners. They need to bring back the walking fingers like in the initial FG ads, but this time have the fingers crushing Calais' as they walk along, with some relaxing background Led Zeppelin music and Marcos Ambrose in stubbies and singlet driving it.
Gobes32 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 01:03 PM   #96
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,540
Default

As long as they sort the bloody diff bush issue out then I am happy for the IRS to go over, that or redesign on please!
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 01:24 PM   #97
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XRFutura
just saw this article on carpoint, sorry if this is repost. Looks very promising.
Ford Boss: Falcon safe beyond 2015
No, its not a repost, thanks for sharing it.

Some very interesting comments there. Particularly:

Quote:
"We have no plans to make any change [to our local manufacturing operations]. We have a facility here that is certainly capable of manufacturing cars and we've invested hundreds of millions of dollars over the years to do so. Why would we invest all this money if it wasn't for the future?

"When the world was in [financial] meltdown and everyone was ... closing hatches because it wasn't a sensible thing to do to spend money, we came out boldly as a company and announced a significant investment to continue to invest in local manufacturing and local products such as Falcon, ute and Territory."
Quote:
"We are currently in the process of evaluating what a new Falcon will be. We need to make a decision by late 2011, early 2012.

"Working out the size, the engine, the package etc, all that is taking place right now... We are very fortunate. When we launched the current generation FG Falcon it actually bought us time. We've actually got time on our side which allows us to then choose which technologies, where the styling is heading, where the car is heading and where customer preferences are heading," Burela elaborated.
Quote:
Ford insists the Broadmeadows and Geelong factories are viable, and pointed to the company's Australian operations posting a profit last financial year as proof of this.
Quote:
"The large car segment over the last 15 to 20 years has declined, there is no question about that. But ... as the industry has grown, the number of cars manufactured in Australia has remained [about the same].

"People in Australia are not averse to driving large cars, what they're absolutely focused on [is] that you deliver them value for money, cost of ownership, fuel economy. And we're working on that," Burela said
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 04:11 PM   #98
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Dazz
Whilst that all sounds very pithy, and an apparently great “put-down,” unfortunately it’s absolute rubbish.
We knew almost a decade ahead of time that the EA26 was going to be developed in Australia, and the same for the AU (code name escapes me for the moment.) Similarly the Barra and Orion were telegraphed well ahead of time.
Just because its designed it doesn't mean that the car is going to continue. Orion(FG) was not approved for production till late 06.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 04:26 PM   #99
b0son
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XRFutura
just saw this article on carpoint, sorry if this is repost. Looks very promising.
Ford Boss: Falcon safe beyond 2015
The Falcon's only as safe as the CEO.
b0son is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 04:40 PM   #100
Ohio XB
Compulsive Hobbiest
 
Ohio XB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

Quote:
Whilst I would LOVE to own a Mustang, their iconic status has allowed them to lag way behind in areas such as handling. Sure, there is a new one due out, and it will supposedly finally get IRS (20 years too late) but I can confidently predict that it will remain decades behind the times and barely up to the standard of the current generation Falcon.
Though I admire the flag waving your comment is not entirely, if not vaguely, accurate. I believe the 2005 Mustang, with it's dinosaur solid rear axle, was questioned about the wisdom of keeping it with this old technology. When a Ford Exectutive was asked why Ford hampered the new Mustang with this detriment the Exec stated "The Mustang doesn't seem to be having any handling problems in the last 5 out of 6 (road) races it won."

2011 Mustang GT with 5.0L engine 0 - 60 MPH in 4.8 seconds. Skid Pad lateral G's - 0.91g .


Bobthabilda: I have no idea how you extrapolated those conclusions.


FOA design and engineering has received all kinds of praise and accolades from Ford's top brass in Dearborn. They have also been listed to be involved in a number of projects rather then being thrown a single token project. It seems FOA D&E are a very big part of One Ford.



Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website
Latest Project: Musclin'

My XB Interceptor project

Wife's 1966 Mustang

My Artworks and Creative Projects Site
Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture,
Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos,
and more!
Ohio XB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 05:59 PM   #101
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

E8 Falcon will be with us for at least another 5-6 years....
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 06:38 PM   #102
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Stronger signals that Ford have resolved to continue RWD Falcon.

Quote:
"We are currently in the process of evaluating what a new Falcon will be. We need to make a decision by late 2011, early 2012.

"Working out the size, the engine, the package etc, all that is taking place right now... We are very fortunate. When we launched the current generation FG Falcon it actually bought us time. We've actually got time on our side which allows us to then choose which technologies, where the styling is heading, where the car is heading and where customer preferences are heading," Burela elaborated.

"We don't have to have a replacement vehicle in place until we get to around the 2016 timeframe."
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 06:53 PM   #103
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

News got to the US.

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/05/r...h-mustang-not/

Quote:
Report: RWD Ford Falcon could merge platforms with Mustang, not Taurus

by Chris Shunk (RSS feed) on Oct 5th 2010 at 10:01AM

A big part of Ford's recent successes can be attributed to the "One Ford" mantra CEO Allan Mulally instituted early on. But while the program may be a recipe for success, speculation stemming from Mulally's comments at the 2010 Detroit Auto Show left some wondering if the next Ford Falcon would one day share a front-wheel drive platform with the Taurus.

RWD-loving Australians Down Under shuttered at the thought of a front-drive Falcon, but Drive reports that comments by Mulally at the Paris Motor Show may calm those fears. The Ford CEO acknowledged that rear drive vehicles still have a rock-solid business case, adding that the automaker would continue to make vehicles that customers want, "starting with you (Australians)."

Mulally didn't specifically state that the Mustang and Falcon would one day share a platform, but several hints indicate the move is very possible. Mulally insisted that rear-wheel drive platforms will be global in the future, adding "we love our rear-wheel drive platforms and we love Mustang, and they're global platforms."

And this isn't the first we've heard about the Falcon and Mustang sharing a rear drive platform. Way back in January Motor Trend cited inside sources at Ford who said the next Mustang would house an independent suspension under it's boot. Those same sources claimed that the Falcon and an unnamed RWD Lincoln would share that platform.

[Source: Drive]
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-10-2010, 09:37 PM   #104
music189
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: bayside melbourne
Posts: 1,241
Cool RWD SAved??? GO Auto latest

Check out the latest goauto enews

http://www.mellor.net/mellor/enews.nsf/edition/CDE155D23E7E22BACA2577B3001CB0F0/$file/GoAutoNews_552.pdf

looks like we have liftoff with the next Falcon
music189 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-10-2010, 09:57 AM   #105
Ohio XB
Compulsive Hobbiest
 
Ohio XB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

Going to read all that when I get the chance. Good link.

How does everyone feel if a Falcon was to be built in the US and maybe sold as a Lincoln to compete in the luxury sports sedan segment? And perhaps a Ford branded derivative with a different looking body?


Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website
Latest Project: Musclin'

My XB Interceptor project

Wife's 1966 Mustang

My Artworks and Creative Projects Site
Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture,
Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos,
and more!
Ohio XB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-10-2010, 11:13 AM   #106
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
Going to read all that when I get the chance. Good link.

How does everyone feel if a Falcon was to be built in the US and maybe sold as a Lincoln to compete in the luxury sports sedan segment? And perhaps a Ford branded derivative with a different looking body?


Steve
Not a problem as long as it is still manufactured here in Australia too. It would be like the VE Commodore and the Camaro sharing the platform but built in Australia and Canada respectively.

Using the RWD expertise of FoA to get a leg-up with the next Mustang and upmarket Lincolns is smart business. The budget could be increased, the volume increased dramatically bringing great cost savings and either a lower sticker or more features/tech for the same price.

I particularly like the idea of reducing the weight of the Mustang and Falcon which is the aim for future cars under One Ford.

They could easily enough have the Falcon in Australia and US, market it as the Scorpion if need be in Europe too with the EB2.0 motor and DSG and a diesel.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-10-2010, 02:40 PM   #107
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
Going to read all that when I get the chance. Good link.

How does everyone feel if a Falcon was to be built in the US and maybe sold as a Lincoln to compete in the luxury sports sedan segment? And perhaps a Ford branded derivative with a different looking body?


Steve
Australia building units for the US would be silly, you NA for their market and use Australia for the market down here.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-10-2010, 03:23 PM   #108
Gobes32
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Gobes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
How does everyone feel if a Falcon was to be built in the US and maybe sold as a Lincoln to compete in the luxury sports sedan segment? And perhaps a Ford branded derivative with a different looking body?


Steve
You are forgetting the sentiment that occurs when a product is manufactured in your own backyard. A Falcon built in the US and brought over here is not the same thing.........
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
A G8E would be good if Ford marketed squarely at Calais V8 owners. They need to bring back the walking fingers like in the initial FG ads, but this time have the fingers crushing Calais' as they walk along, with some relaxing background Led Zeppelin music and Marcos Ambrose in stubbies and singlet driving it.
Gobes32 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 02:04 PM   #109
Ohio XB
Compulsive Hobbiest
 
Ohio XB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

In my theory I don't mean for the Falcon built in the US to be shipped to Australia. I only mean if LHD Falcons were built in the US for the NA market. Though of course it would be preferred by Australians that the Falcon for ANY markey be built in Australia, is there any animosity if it were to be built here in the US, or is it accepted as the way things have to be?

Me and a coworker were kicking some ideas around this week while working on the line and we wanted to get your views on the idea.


Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website
Latest Project: Musclin'

My XB Interceptor project

Wife's 1966 Mustang

My Artworks and Creative Projects Site
Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture,
Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos,
and more!
Ohio XB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 02:28 PM   #110
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Would have no issue at all if US wanted to build LHD falcons for N.A market providing Dearborn underwrite Ford Aus Manufacturing Ops.
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 03:25 PM   #111
Gobes32
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Gobes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
In my theory I don't mean for the Falcon built in the US to be shipped to Australia. I only mean if LHD Falcons were built in the US for the NA market. Though of course it would be preferred by Australians that the Falcon for ANY markey be built in Australia, is there any animosity if it were to be built here in the US, or is it accepted as the way things have to be?

Me and a coworker were kicking some ideas around this week while working on the line and we wanted to get your views on the idea.


Steve
My bad, I think that would be a fantastic idea, fingers crossed............
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
A G8E would be good if Ford marketed squarely at Calais V8 owners. They need to bring back the walking fingers like in the initial FG ads, but this time have the fingers crushing Calais' as they walk along, with some relaxing background Led Zeppelin music and Marcos Ambrose in stubbies and singlet driving it.
Gobes32 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 05:39 PM   #112
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

Makes sense of course for LHD versions to be built there & RHD here - unless they wanted to do a "few" LHD utes for example, or a "few" RHD Lincolns
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 05:59 PM   #113
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
In my theory I don't mean for the Falcon built in the US to be shipped to Australia. I only mean if LHD Falcons were built in the US for the NA market. Though of course it would be preferred by Australians that the Falcon for ANY markey be built in Australia, is there any animosity if it were to be built here in the US, or is it accepted as the way things have to be?

Me and a coworker were kicking some ideas around this week while working on the line and we wanted to get your views on the idea.


Steve
If it's built there it's easier to sell to those in the U.S.
Plus, we can't keep up here to supply our own market let alone anyone else's.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-10-2010, 06:32 PM   #114
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Would have no issue at all if US wanted to build LHD falcons for N.A market providing Dearborn underwrite Ford Aus Manufacturing Ops.
Would the Top Hat have to be changed as well?

Flat Rock builds LHD Mustang and LHD E8 while Broadmeadows builds Falcon and RHD Mustang?
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2010, 02:02 AM   #115
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Plus, we can't keep up here to supply our own market let alone anyone else's.
I'm sure they could increase the line rate back up if they were guranteed (and not a GM gurantee mind you) 100K+ units a year.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2010, 05:58 AM   #116
Crazy Dazz
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 4,881
Default

Unfortunately some people seem to be confused between the concepts of the Falcon continuing as a (uniquely) Australian car, and that of a car badged as a Falcon being assembled in Australia.

Nobody doubts that Ford will continue to sell a car badged as the Falcon. Whilst the volume apparently nolonger warrants it’s own development, it can probably justify ongoing local assembly.
In some ways, I would like to see imported RWD Falcons based on an updated Mustang platform (similar to the DEW98) perhaps even with a Coupe version.
However local assembly IMHO points towards the D3 Platform, shared between the Falcon/Taurus, and the Territory/Explorer.
Crazy Dazz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2010, 06:30 PM   #117
Crazy Dazz
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 4,881
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio XB
Though I admire the flag waving your comment is not entirely, if not vaguely, accurate. I believe the 2005 Mustang, with it's dinosaur solid rear axle, was questioned about the wisdom of keeping it with this old technology. When a Ford Exectutive was asked why Ford hampered the new Mustang with this detriment the Exec stated "The Mustang doesn't seem to be having any handling problems in the last 5 out of 6 (road) races it won."
Funnily enough, that’s EXACTLY what they used to say about the Falcon, twenty years ago.

It’s hardly Flag-waving on my part, I LOVE BIG American cars, but not even Americans claim that their cars are setup for handling or roadholding.
Oh, and don’t be fooled that the crap setup foisted on the Mustang was anything other than a cost saving measure. The current Mustang was to have been developed on the Global DEW platform (along with Jaguar, Aston Martin, etc.) One derivative, the DEW98, was used for a Lincoln model and it incorporated double-wishbone Independent suspension all-round. However to keep Mustang costs down, they opted for struts and a live axle, and dubbed it the D2C.
Crazy Dazz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2010, 07:01 PM   #118
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Dazz
The current Mustang was to have been developed on the Global DEW platform (along with Jaguar, Aston Martin, etc.) One derivative, the DEW98, was used for a Lincoln model and it incorporated double-wishbone Independent suspension all-round. However to keep Mustang costs down, they opted for struts and a live axle, and dubbed it the D2C.
I correspond with an engineer who was on S197 and what you're saying is not true.
The only part of dew that was used was a small part of the floor pan, the
shock towers on the DEW were too close to allow Ford DOHC V8s to be used.
DEW was a nightmarishly expensive platform, even Lincoln struggled to justify the LS and
the two seater Thunderbird was another low production run for the exclusive platform.


When the S197 was begun engineers looked at BA Falcon platform, DEW and Fresh design. To cut a long story short, they ultimately went with their own design because DEW was completely unworkable and expensive, Falcon held hope but was too different around the rear wheel well area of the chassis to be developed into a Mustang Coupe. In the end it was just easier to start with a clean sheet design.

You are right about Phil marten's penny pinching, the original S197 design had CB IRS with unique pick up points that allowed a rear seat between the wheels coupe. It was torn up to save a pittance, one of the lead engineers was so upset that he left the project.

One interesting foot note was that at the time the IRS was being scrapped FoA was working with the Mustang engineers on changing their design to accommodate the Mustang and provide a common affordable IRS. Unfortunately, Territory was at design lock in and a common IRS escaped them...

Last edited by jpd80; 11-10-2010 at 07:08 PM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-10-2010, 01:30 PM   #119
Ohio XB
Compulsive Hobbiest
 
Ohio XB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Dazz
Funnily enough, that’s EXACTLY what they used to say about the Falcon, twenty years ago.

It’s hardly Flag-waving on my part, I LOVE BIG American cars, but not even Americans claim that their cars are setup for handling or roadholding.
Oh, and don’t be fooled that the crap setup foisted on the Mustang was anything other than a cost saving measure. The current Mustang was to have been developed on the Global DEW platform (along with Jaguar, Aston Martin, etc.) One derivative, the DEW98, was used for a Lincoln model and it incorporated double-wishbone Independent suspension all-round. However to keep Mustang costs down, they opted for struts and a live axle, and dubbed it the D2C.

No, no Americans believe the solid axle was for any other reason than a cost saving measure. That is believed by everyone. However, if you are going to have a solid rear axle, Ford has it figured out to the extreme limits of it's capability.

I am sure most Americans that are considering a next gen Mustang are praying for IRS.


Steve
__________________
My Filmmaking Career Website
Latest Project: Musclin'

My XB Interceptor project

Wife's 1966 Mustang

My Artworks and Creative Projects Site
Oil Paintings, Airbrushing, Metal Sculpture,
Custom Cars, Replica Movie Props, Videos,
and more!
Ohio XB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-10-2010, 09:32 PM   #120
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

Agree Steve, except for the highly vocal drag racing focused minority. Defending the live axle using race track results doesn't wash either - race tracks are smooth so the unsprung weight issue doesn't raise its head.
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL