![]() |
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#391 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,821
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#392 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: nz
Posts: 1,846
|
I agree
__________________
Fgx xr8 winter white manual, gone but not forgotten 22 mitsubishi outlander XLS PHEV Au11 fairmont Ghia ported gt40p heads ,comp springs and locks Xe 264 cam,custom intake,pacemaker tri y headers 524nm torque 19 Triton GSXR manual |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#393 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,476
|
Simon
So an mhev still saves a reasonable per centage of fuel as starting a petrol car uses alot of fuel. So are puma and focus mhev primarily a marketing exercise or a fuel saving exercise. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#394 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,821
|
my opinion is mine alone, but I think mHEVs are 100% a marketing gimmick. The sticker value might show better FE, but then so does stop/start technology. Does it convert into a real world fuel saving? well, for me it doesn't. Maybe it does for some.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#395 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Catland
Posts: 3,638
|
Had a mate who did that with his HG panelvan. Down a hill would put it into neutral, and sometimes, with the 'economy' idle set, it would stall and turn itself off. The regen breaking was him frantically trying to restart it as he had power brakes. Fun times.
__________________
I6 + AWD |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#396 | ||
Cabover nut
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Onsite Eastcoast
Posts: 10,833
|
Georgia overdrive.
__________________
heritagestonemason.com/Fordlouisvillerestoration In order that the labour of centuries past may not be in vain during the centuries to come...... D. Diderot 1752
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#397 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,288
|
Quote:
Back then, GM was looking at ways to minimise idle fuel use on test cycle, a “cheat”. Looking at actual hybrids like Escape with 1.1 Kwhr or the PHEV with 14.4 Kwhr, the basic hybrid that’s not sold here is much better bang for bucks for fuel savings. That small battery is way advanced of the passive hybrid stop-start which is a joke. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#399 | ||
Donating Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,239
|
All he did was moan about all the missing features. It's the base model moron!
__________________
PX MK II Ranger FG XR6 FG X XR8 Mustang GT T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#400 | ||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,539
|
It's Maric... Par for the course. Although he did review escape quite well a couple of years ago.
__________________
UA2 TREND 4WD BI TURBO |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#401 | ||
PURSUIT 250
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,786
|
It’s missing things that should be in the base model. Cup holders and more storage. I find his reviews spot on.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#402 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,072
|
It's the base model but it's also $53K - I'm thinking that's where the emphasis is there.
Interestingly it's optioned up with the twin turbo engine though, curious what it costs in povvo spec single turbo guise. If you were to compare it just on price that's i30N premium and mid spec WRX money and this thing has drum brakes on the rear axle and no auto up windows. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#403 | |||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,539
|
Quote:
It's all about perspective. Not to mention it still passes ADR's with drum brakes.
__________________
UA2 TREND 4WD BI TURBO |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#404 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,072
|
Quote:
The VDJ79 Landcruiser passes ADRs too without meeting the side impact crash requirements of ADR85 - only because they increased its GVM specifically to avoid having to meet them. So meeting ADRs with drum brakes is a bit of a moot point really, just because something meets the standards, doesn't particularly mean its good. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#405 | |||
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,539
|
Quote:
You can buy an ozito drill with batteries and charger and still have change compared to a makita skin. It's just how the world is. Products get sold for what they can sell for not what they're worth. I do agree that the base ranger is expensive for what it is but hey, they can get away with it.. For now. Picking on the brakes really is moot. The brakes work. It's the same as picking on Holden v8 models for having push rods. Yes, it's old tech, but it still works fine.
__________________
UA2 TREND 4WD BI TURBO |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#406 | ||
Donating Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,239
|
Posted elsewhere but relevant to this thread -
Today I had the Jaguar in for it's 75,000 km service...........with 13,277 km on the clock. ![]() This dealer is combined with Ford, Honda, VW and Audi so the loan cars can be varied. I was actually booked for a Puma but ended up with a new Ranger XLS instead. ![]() ![]() ![]() This particular example was finished in Aluminum Silver and fitted with the Bi-Turbo / 10-speed 4x4 powertrain and was showing just on 6,000 km on the clock. Full retail on this vehicle is $60,178. So, I had a chance to drive this car around a bit today and these are my notes - Positives - - The seats and overall ride are brilliant. Yes, you know it's a commercial vehicle but it's clear Ford put effort into tuning the ride to seats. The cloth trim undoubtably contributed to this factor over the leather clad PX III Wildtrack I'm comparing it to. - The effort put into the little things is pleasing. Finally, rear air vents! The sidestep on the tub is a nice touch, as is the silly but novel measuring scale molded into the tailgate. ![]() - The little touches made to the user interface are nice, the animated Ranger and Built Ford Tough logo's offer a little theater to the cabin, especially pleasing as this is considered an entry level spec. ![]() ![]() - Say what you will about a tiny 2.0 diesel powering a 2.4 tonne pickup truck, but this engine and gearing are plenty powerful. I will say that the way Ford have "plumped" up the styling of the car has really increased room under the hood, there is a LOT of spare room under there. ![]() - The overall driving experience is pleasant, steering feels good, brakes are fine and as mentioned, rides decently. - This will be subjective, but I have come to really like the styling, especially at the rear. I even kinda like the cheap halogen headlights. Again, you can see where Ford have made gains in overall size, the cabin remaining static while the tub and front quarters have really been pushed out to gain width. ![]() Negative's - Sadly, there is so many areas where Ford have made change for change sake. Many little details that I'm sure you will adapt to over time, just keep in mind I'm coming from driving a PX of some sort for nearly 10 years now. - The door handles are stupid, compounded by having a blanking piece where they used to be. You would get used to this but again, change for change sake. ![]() ![]() - The location of the headlight controls which are obscured by the steering column is silly, especially considering they prioritized a useless storage slot over a more logical placement of these basic controls. ![]() - The transmission selector has lost the S or Sport mode function. Now, this may sound trivial on a pickup truck, but I have found this mode to useful for towing or when on winding roads as it stops the gearbox from laboring the engine or hunting. The manual function is basically useless, taking far, far too long to respond to inputs and will override the driver anyway. What was wrong with the up-down function the early PX Ranger's had, they were even orientated it correctly with forward for a lower gear and backwards for a higher one. ![]() - Engine vibration. This seems worse than the same powertrain in our Wildtrack. The calibration of the gearbox was also quite firm in it's shifting when coming to a stop. - Interior material quality is absolutely crap. I know this is a entry level model, but I couldn't help feeling even my PX II XL had nicer materials. The overall build quality is fine, but the materials are hard as a rock and have that nasty scratchy feeling to them. I remind readers at this point that the vehicle costs over $60,000 without options. Not good enough! - The lack of proper gauges bothers me. Sure, it looks cool, but the simulated fuel, temperature, revs and speedo lack clear legibility. Form over function. Saying that, I'm sure you would get used to them. ![]() - The large central screen, again, looks cool but was way too laggy for a vehicle in this era. - The tray had no lining and this example was already scratched and dented fairly badly. Think of this way, in 1999 Ford put a plastic tub liner in EVERY Falcon Ute they made, on a vehicle that started at about $25,000. And yet, this $60,000 pickup doesn't! I can't help thinking if a little less money was put into the glitter of fancy screens and "easter eggs" and little more spent on the basics that this would be a more complete vehicle. I think the most egregious aspect was the animated welcome screen depicting a higher spec Sport or XLT.......on an entry XLS, as if to remind the customer every time he didn't have the flagship model. ![]() ![]() Overall, I liked driving this particular vehicle, and I have no doubt it would be fine workhorse. However, the interior's nasty materials really let the side down, to the point where I don't see this being $60,000 vehicle, $45,000 tops in my opinion. No wonder Ford are having trouble selling these models. I've gone to the trouble of writing all that because, ideally, I would like to upgrade my current PX II XL to the new model, but this experience has me questioning that desire. ![]() My current Ranger, a single cab chassis with a custom steel tray, cost me just on $30,000 in 2016. The cheapest new Ranger now starts at $36,180 before on-roads and a tray, so let's say $40,000, meaning a 10k leap in cost. Admittedly, that includes an automatic transmission and a large increase in standard features. It also includes high-ride suspension, something completely useless on a 4x2. Frankly, I don't want the single turbo 2.0 and 6 speed auto, meaning I need to get the 4x4 Bi-Turbo 10-speed. That spec starts at $47,280 before on-roads and a tray. That's $50k for an entry level single cab chassis work truck. The reality is, the Ranger is the best of the bunch, which would justify a price premium, just not the one Ford are asking, especially with that interior. I think for now, it's best to wait this out and run up a few more km's on my current model.
__________________
PX MK II Ranger FG XR6 FG X XR8 Mustang GT T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
12 users like this post: |
![]() |
#407 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,072
|
Quote:
I have a big problem with non responsive screens for interfaces, I've seen this on a couple cars now where the screens take ages to respond to your inputs, how come they've had this figured out on phones for 15 years and they seem to be using potatoes to power their infotainment systems in cars in 2023? |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
3 users like this post: |
![]() |
#408 | |||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,701
|
Quote:
- I find the door handles great as you are holding a solid handle while opening. Handy in tight car spaces and windy days. - While I agree the headlight switch is obscured, I don't think I've touched mine since I picked up the Raptor. The auto headlights do a great job. Maybe in foggy areas it would be a pain in the rectum. - I can't say I've found the screen laggy. Unless there is a difference between the 10" in the XLS and the 12" version in the Raptor. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#409 | ||
PURSUIT 250
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 5,786
|
Some fair points. Except the tray liner. Ford put that factory for falcons otherwise they tray would have been useless
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#410 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,821
|
after a short while I love the new door handles. if you reach across with your left hand, you naturally look over your shoulder as you open the door. Lifesaver for cyclists.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#411 | |||
Donating Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,239
|
Quote:
__________________
PX MK II Ranger FG XR6 FG X XR8 Mustang GT T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#412 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 459
|
Quote:
From of cost of ownership point of view secondhand highrider 2WD Hilux seems like a good buy as Toyotas hold their value and have the reliability reputation. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#413 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,821
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#414 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,939
|
At work, we got a late 2022 Workmate Hilux single cab 2wd, just realised that they no longer have intermittent wipers (letlone variable)
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#415 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
First time i've ever heard someone complain about them. Usually the journos find something silly to pick on but they praised them. And you can use them with thick gloves on too. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#416 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,072
|
Quote:
![]() They probably won't have brakes on the rear axle next - already has drums it's basically like having no brakes anyway ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#417 | ||
Donating Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,239
|
Ford Australia built Falcon Ute tubs with the plastic bedliner as an integral part of the tub dating back to 1999.
Ranger tubs are all build with a steel bases and inner sides, up spec models then have a tub liner attached over the top. So, there is an element of redundancy and added weight here. The observation I'm making is that Ford Australia showed innovation and built their tubs for Falcon in a smarter way, eliminating added steel, saving weight and giving all Ute customers a more versatile and durable solution. Plastic tubs also age better than painted steel, as mentioned, the car I drove was already jacked up with dints and scraped paint. I do remember at the time Ford making comment about those tubs being able to be replaced after hard use if required. The way I see it, using past experience and knowledge could have been implemented here on the Ranger, making it a better workhorse in the process. I was probably too hard on this aspect in the review I posted last week, but I guess I'm intrigued at these sorts of decisions car makers make.
__________________
PX MK II Ranger FG XR6 FG X XR8 Mustang GT T3 TS50 - gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#418 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,821
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |
![]() |
#419 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,072
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#420 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,939
|
Yeah the plastic tub of the AU onwards was genius.
However, the bean counters could have allowed rustproofing/galvanisation underneath on the frame.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
This user likes this post: |