Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > OzECruisers (E/N/D Series) > OzECruisers General Discussions

OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS

View Poll Results: Which is better, pod filters or panel filters.
Pod Filters. 47 39.50%
Panel Filters. 43 36.13%
Either. 12 10.08%
Wouldnt have the slightest clue because im not technical minded! 17 14.29%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2006, 02:46 AM   #1
DEVL-XR
EBII XR6
 
DEVL-XR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bendigo. Victoria
Posts: 5,278
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default Pod filter or Pannel Filter??

ok just wondering what peoples thoughts are about pod filters and pannel filters.
for instance:

1. pod filters are better because...
2. pannel filters are better because...
3. dosent matter as they both do the same thing...

pretty much what people think are better and why they think this.

cheers
braden

__________________
DEVLXR
DEVL-XR is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 09:30 AM   #2
Kenaz
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Kenaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,064
Default

I got a K&N panel filter. Not the best $120 I've ever spent...
__________________
02 BA XR6 T U R B O
Venom Red, Auto 13.97 @ 101mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheels Nov 02
It's suave, more subtle, and yet no less stirring. In fact, the boosted Ford is more polished than any big sedan Australia has ever produced. It's just so damn good, it makes the SS feel crude... Ignore the WRX. Forget the E49. Falcon XR6 Turbo is king.
Kenaz is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:21 PM   #3
LUXO_8
windsor user
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geelong
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenaz
I got a K&N panel filter. Not the best $120 I've ever spent...
i did too and do agree.......im using a paper one again
LUXO_8 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:30 PM   #4
Interceptor'85
Interceptin'
 
Interceptor'85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 970
Default

I've heard a lot of people recommend the pod filter over the panel, still keeping it in the airbox.

What I want to know is what other respectible brands for pod filters other than K&N? Theres gotta be decent stuff without the heavy price tag out there.
__________________
'95 EF II Falcon,
'INTERCEPTOR'
'72 XA Fairmont Coupe,
'XA Muscle'

Interceptor'85 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 09:33 AM   #5
stevo's XR6
Regular Member
 
stevo's XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 86
Default

i have heard that pod filters draw in hot air from the enigine, thats if u do have it in the air box and just out and about lol
but that what i have only heard... probably true
stevo's XR6 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:11 PM   #6
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

$10 40,000km-old vacuumed twice Paper Ryco panel filter FTW :P
mcflux is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:34 PM   #7
LUXO_8
windsor user
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geelong
Posts: 13,123
Default

K&N and BMC are the 2 "decent" ones......... mine was a BMC from memory.

though i wouldnt waste your money.....spend it on something to actually give you some performance.....
LUXO_8 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:51 PM   #8
DEVL-XR
EBII XR6
 
DEVL-XR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bendigo. Victoria
Posts: 5,278
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default

my mate just had a $30 pod filter, made the noise but i couldnt tell any/much difference when i trialled it on my car. iv still got the standard filter from the factory in my car. i was thinking of getting a k&n panel but im not sure its worth it.
so why is K&N and BMC so much better than the cheap brands? how do they differ and how do they give you better performance?!
__________________
DEVLXR
DEVL-XR is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:59 PM   #9
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

They use cotton style filter membranes which are oiled. The potential problem with these are that droplets of oil can get sucked into the engine. Not really a big deal on the sixes, but the V8s have their MAF right behind the airbox, and oil that gets trapped on the hotwire in the MAF can potentially fubar it.

I don't understand paying $120 for a filter, when a paper filter can set you back ~$10.

OK, so the K&N has a 1 million km warranty. Sif you'll drive 1,000,000 kms in your car though. And the price difference between the K&N and normal paper filter means that you might break even after ~100,000kms, or roughly 10 paper filters. But then there's the cleaning/oiling of the K&N filter, and I'm unsure about the costs of the cleaning products you use.
mcflux is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 01:08 PM   #10
ef_classic
Banned
 
ef_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Castlemaine, Central Vic
Posts: 264
Default

I had a pod on my ef for a while, just after puting it on i loved it.
Bit better throttle response and a nice noise.

But as others said you are sucking hot air into the engine.
Iam gonna go panel filter next.
ef_classic is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 04:01 PM   #11
70caprigt3k
Nitrous Junkie
 
70caprigt3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 859
Default

Panel for me, Mainly because i dont like the look of pod filters and unless they are in an air box they draw in hot air and reduce performance and for the amount of effort to install a pod properly and for its very very little increase in performance might as well use a panel filter.
__________________
'97 Toyota Supra - 6spd, Tilton Triple Plate, Built 2J, T88H-38GK, HKS 272 Cams, Haltech E11V2
70caprigt3k is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 04:23 PM   #12
Mickus
Banned
 
Mickus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,042
Default

I would go with a POD but ONLY if you had an EF/EL airbox to put it in, otherwise like mentioned you are drawing in the hot air from the engine bay.
Mickus is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 04:33 PM   #13
Professor Farnsworth
Fossil fuel consumer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mod For: Pub, Bar, Sales Yard, Show 'N Shine, Photoshop, AU to BF, FG to FGX, Territory & Sports Bar
Posts: 17,032
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Many years of valuable contributions to the forum, including some superb build threads. 
Default

filters are (in most cases) purely a 'i know i've got one in there' type item. Pods will give a slightly different, more 'rushing' induction noise, but so will taking the snorkel off..

Some people will tell you you'll gain 5rwkw... which is basically a bunch of BS. Washable filters are good for one thing, longevity. Clean and re-lube then whack back in, they'll last for YEARS. I put a pod on the EL and it pinged like buggery. The EB is running a K&N panel, but was already in it when i bought the car.

As others have said, spend money on something that is worth it. Having said that, the K&N that i put on the EL is still here, still brand spankers, only had it on for 10 minutes. The EL didn't like it coz it had MAF/airflow issues. Yours for $50 if you decide to swing that way.
Professor Farnsworth is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 04:33 PM   #14
Professor Farnsworth
Fossil fuel consumer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mod For: Pub, Bar, Sales Yard, Show 'N Shine, Photoshop, AU to BF, FG to FGX, Territory & Sports Bar
Posts: 17,032
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Many years of valuable contributions to the forum, including some superb build threads. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickus
I would go with a POD but ONLY if you had an EF/EL airbox to put it in, otherwise like mentioned you are drawing in the hot air from the engine bay.
that's only an issue if you do a LOT of peak hour/idling type driving. Once the car is moving there's minimal difference.
Professor Farnsworth is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:09 PM   #15
GREERZ_04_BA
Dude.Sweet.Dude.Sweet
 
GREERZ_04_BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: bayswater north
Posts: 341
Default

pod is better sound wise.i had one and it stuffed up my revs.
but i now hav a K&N pannel filter and its still suck in heaps of air..
__________________
:eclipsee_ GREERZ
2004 BA XR8
full leather,premo sound,sat nav.

.


www.myspace.com/greerz86
GREERZ_04_BA is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:42 PM   #16
CaRtZ
Aspiring mr efxr
 
CaRtZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Albury - Wodonga
Posts: 1,185
Default

i think pods are only good for the sound. not if ur lookin for quality. dunno bout the in box setups though.
__________________
EF Wagon Project:

Standard = 99.6rwkw <!> 2.5" SuperCat cat back exhaust, Wade 1636 cam, K&N boxed pod (new dyno required
Sony headunit, splits, 6.5"s and 2 x 12" with response precision amp = 135.5 dB


Daily = Ae82 '85 corolla Fwd :togo: , 5 speed, 12" sub, 6x9's, green LED's

the course i am studying: http://www.wodonga.tafe.edu.au/01_courses/course.jsp?id=AUR30905NANA
CaRtZ is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:46 PM   #17
RavenLS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,419
Default

cant beat the induction noise of a pod
__________________
405rwhp LS1, FG XR6T Ute manual, VE series 2 Omega LPG.
RavenLS1 is offline  
Old 09-10-2006, 01:43 PM   #18
mUTHA
DALLY 41
 
mUTHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 79
Default

pods sound wikd and if setup right can be very good but takes effort.. im seriously thinkin of makeing a full alloy heatshild and having a pod with my snorkel from my bonnet scoop feeding one side while the other will be from surrounding air but from what ive been told the panles are better for both falcons and commos as they take the air easier and respond better but dont sounds quiet as wikd...
mUTHA is offline  
Old 09-10-2006, 05:24 PM   #19
noosacuda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
noosacuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
Default

I run a "pod in a box",which is fed cold air by the Shaker.I don't think i could work it with a panel filter.
noosacuda is offline  
Old 09-10-2006, 07:18 PM   #20
SVT8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
SVT8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melb, Vic
Posts: 1,088
Default

although the pod dose look good out of the box, it might be best to put it in (if you can). Otherwise just get a panel filter.

Remember exposed pod's are illegal to.
SVT8 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 11:23 PM   #21
SB4
E-Series Member
 
SB4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 200
Default

I have a K&N panel one in mine. I reckon a K&N pod filter in an EF-AU box with the 'EL Sequential' scoop will work very well.
SB4 is offline  
Old 11-10-2006, 06:03 PM   #22
DEVL-XR
EBII XR6
 
DEVL-XR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bendigo. Victoria
Posts: 5,278
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default

so will a pod filter fit in and ef box? i know theres not enough room in the EB one. if it a straight conversion also or not? so do AU boxs fit too and allow enought room for a pod inside??
__________________
DEVLXR
DEVL-XR is offline  
Old 11-10-2006, 06:49 PM   #23
Mickus
Banned
 
Mickus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,042
Default

Yeah man, the pods fit in the ef/el box, u just gotta modify the intake pipe i think? to make the pod fit to the pipe, but then if u had the ef box, youd need the bbm and all the other stuff that goes with it. Correct me if I'm wrong though lol
Mickus is offline  
Old 11-10-2006, 09:16 PM   #24
reded
ThUmPeR
 
reded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shepparton
Posts: 612
Default

well i just baught myslef a pod filter and will be installin it on sunday.
so i will be able to tell you how it goes.

cheers troy
__________________
1994 ED Falcon
ICE:
7" DVD
BIG MTX sterio
OTHER:
2.5" exuast, Pacemaker extractors
K&N Flat pannel
20" Gianna wheels
Dropped on Pedders
BA Bonnet bulge
clear indicators all round
Full EL Ghia interior
reded is offline  
Old 11-10-2006, 09:18 PM   #25
snypereb
[EBGLT]
 
snypereb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cazza Dee
Posts: 4,829
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default

pods look and sound awesome go the pod
__________________
[EBGLT]

Become an E-Series Owners Club Member Today!
http://eseries.com.au/index.php/membership/
snypereb is offline  
Old 10-02-2007, 04:47 AM   #26
doofdoof23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 53
Default

i personally would remove the whole intake and rip off the throttle body.

expect wheelstands
doofdoof23 is offline  
Old 22-10-2006, 11:14 AM   #27
El Venom
normality is boring
Donating Member1
 
El Venom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Up in the hills on the QLD/NSW boarder
Posts: 1,803
Default

I have a k&n panel in my car. I could feel the car breathe easier and it now has a better response. i am about to install a custom cold air induction so hopefully it should only get better. As for induction noise i get that with the panel filter, even more when the cai is finished
El Venom is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 11:53 PM   #28
Sleeperau
Highway Taxi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 593
Default Filter

I used a K&N Panel filter in both the EF, AU & previously EL Falcon. I also used the pod filter in an EF & AU. I fitted the pod filter to the EF & tested it late afternoon.(very happy) The Simota pod was FAR better than the K&N panel. The next day in 30c + heat my wife(unbiased test bed) who didn't know I changed the filter complained, what have you done!(in tune with the car). I then put the pod inside the airbox & all was good. I can't say anything about induction noise though, I have never heard it. The throttle response was better but dont expect miracles. The Pod wins in my books from my experiences but only enclosed in the box. I hope this helps.
__________________
Close only counts in Horse Shoes & Hand Grenades. :evil_laug
Sleeperau is offline  
Old 08-02-2007, 11:38 PM   #29
Damo
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,078
Default

i used to not run a filter on my EA sometimes, sounded awesome and went a bit better.
Damo is offline  
Old 10-02-2007, 01:32 AM   #30
BrunsELXR6
ALPINE Slug!!!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somerville, VIC
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damo
i used to not run a filter on my EA sometimes, sounded awesome and went a bit better.

Thats always a good option if you like to play with fire....
__________________
97' EL XR6
Pacemakers > hi flow cat >ESA 2.5" system now with a resonator. BMC panel filter
Manual T5 Gearbox >HD PBR Clutch
Koni Sport Adjustables inside Lovells Super lows VR
Full noltec poly bushes throughout

Rather Large ALPINE TYPE X Sound system
Fully sound Deadend (dynamat extreme)

ELXR6T Custom Plates
BrunsELXR6 is offline  
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL